The Master Plan for Education also called for the development of a new system of schools.
Checkout this video:
The Master Plan for Education, introduced in 1960, was a 10-year plan devised by the Victorian government to bring the state’s schools up to a uniform standard. The plan called for the construction of new schools, the improvement of existing schools, and the introduction of a number of initiatives to improve the quality of education. While the Master Plan was largely successful in achieving its goals, it also had a number of unintended consequences, some of which are still being felt today.
The Master Plan for Education
The Master Plan for Education, also known as the Coleman Report, was published in 1966. The report was commissioned by the US Department of Education and written by sociologist James S. Coleman. The report called for major changes to the way education was delivered in the United States.
Provisions of the Master Plan
The Master Plan for Education was a California state education plan created in 1960. The goal of the Master Plan was to provide all Californians with access to high-quality education, from preschool through college. The Master Plan called for a three-tiered system of education, with each level providing a different type of education:
1. Preschool and elementary school would provide a basic foundation in reading, writing, and arithmetic.
2. Middle and high school would prepare students for either college or entry into the workforce.
3. The California Community Colleges would provide affordable, accessible postsecondary education for all Californians.
The Master Plan also established the California State University and University of California systems, which were designed to offer world-class higher education to the top students in the state.
Reactions to the Master Plan
When the Master Plan for Education was released in 1960, it was met with mixed reactions. Some people lauded it as a much-needed step forward for the state of California, while others criticized it as being too ambitious and unrealistic.
Supporters of the Master Plan pointed to the fact that it called for a major investment in education, including the construction of new schools and colleges, as well as the hiring of more teachers. They also praised the fact that it proposed to make education more accessible to all Californians, regardless of their economic status.
Critics, on the other hand, argued that the Master Plan was too idealistic and that it did not take into account the realities of California’s budget. They also questioned whether the state would be able to find enough qualified teachers to meet the demand.
Despite the mixed reactions, the Master Plan for Education remains one of the most influential documents in California’s history. It helped shape the state’s educational system and set a precedent for future investment in education.
The Impact of the Master Plan
The Master Plan for Education was developed in 1960 by the California Legislature with the goal of making higher education accessible to all Californians. The Plan called for the construction of new campuses, the expansion of existing campuses, and the establishment of community colleges. The Plan had a significant impact on the state of California and its higher education system.
The Master Plan for Education in California, which was released in 1960, called for the segregation of public schools by race. The plan was intended to address the problem of racially imbalanced schools, but it also had the effect of reinforcing existing disparities between white and non-white students.
Segregation had a profound impact on the quality of education that students received. White students generally had access to better resources and facilities than non-white students, and this often led to higher levels of achievement. Non-white students, on the other hand, often attended overcrowded and underfunded schools. This contributed to lower levels of achievement and made it more difficult for them to compete with white students for jobs and opportunities after graduation.
The Master Plan helped to perpetuate these disparities by codifying segregation into law. Although the plan was eventually overturned, its impact is still felt today in the form of inequality in education.
On Educational Quality
The Master Plan also called for an improvement in the quality of education. To meet this goal, the state set up a minimum salary schedule for teachers and established educational standards that all schools were required to meet. The state also began to offer scholarships and low-interest loans to encourage students to pursue teaching careers.
The drafters of the Master Plan for Education did not explicitly call for the elimination of all disparities in education. However, they did envision a future in which every student would have equal access to a high-quality education, regardless of race, income, or zip code. While we have made some progress towards this goal over the past fifty years, we still have a long way to go. If we are to achieve the vision of the Master Plan, we must continue to fight for educational equity in our state.